17 May
2010
17 May
'10
10:02 a.m.
On 05/17/2010 10:05 AM, Maxime van Noppen wrote:
On 05/15/2010 09:18 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
I think that this sounds very much like an optimizer bug and the way to understand what's going on is to submit a bug report to the GCC bugzilla. It could, in principle, be an aliasing violation issue in boost::function, but I doubt it. g++ since 4.4 is getting more aggressive with its aliasing assumptions when optimizing.
Ouch. I'll report to GCC then.