23 Mar
2017
23 Mar
'17
9:35 p.m.
On 23 March 2017 at 22:23, Julian D. via Boost-users
That appears to be the definition of what license they wanted, not the actual license.
And they they got what they wanted. The pages says it clearly. "It was requested that a single Boost license be developed that met the traditional requirements that Boost licenses, particularly: (...) The result is the Boost Software License: (...)"
The license body makes it unclear if I can use this in a closed-source commercial environment
Contact a lawyer then. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net