On Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:50 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
AMDG
On 03/05/2016 07:21 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
I want to start a new sub-thread about some of the concerns of Steven Watanabe about whether some of the contents of this library fits better in Boost.Config. In particular the file boost/fit/returns.hpp.
When I mentioned Boost.Config, I was talking about things like
#ifndef BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE #ifdef _MSC_VER #define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 1 #else #define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 0 #endif
#endif
This is can be configurable, whereas Boost.Config it is not.
or
#ifndef BOOST_FIT_HAS_TEMPLATE_ALIAS #if (defined(__GNUC__) && !defined (__clang__) && __GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 7) #define BOOST_FIT_HAS_TEMPLATE_ALIAS 0 #else #define BOOST_FIT_HAS_TEMPLATE_ALIAS 1 #endif
#endif
This could be replaced with Boost.Config, however, I have ran into problems before with template aliases on gcc 4.7, so I wanted to make this configurable as well, although it could fallback onto Boost.Config right now.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users