Re: [Boost-users] [test] testing protected/private methods out of test suits

AMDG Robert Mecklenburg wrote:

I would swear that the standard indicated that public/private had no effect on visibility, just accessibility. That is, changing a symbol's access from private to public did not change the meaning of a program. Stroustrup uses such language in the D&E of C++.

If it is public in some places and private in others, it violates the one definition rule and all bets are off. In Christ, Steven Watanabe