22 Dec
2005
22 Dec
'05
7:38 p.m.
codeur@altern.org wrote:
I would guess that if you trace this error back to the original ar << ? in your code you will find that the ? is non-const.
The original one is just my reference to a vector of share pointers of objects (that contains doubles, eh ?! it is track_never). And yes, of course it's not constant ;)
No no no, please don't tell me that I have to wrap these doubles. I can't. It's not my code and it would be ugly.
Without actually seeing the code, I can't tell you what I think you should do. Robert Ramey