4 Aug
2010
4 Aug
'10
8:06 p.m.
On Aug 4, 2010, at 3:22 PM, WB wrote:
Case 3 runs in ~1.8...1.9s, case 1 and 2 in 0.81...0.84s. This is the same ratio I already had (at least I'm not confused about that). So your 0.65s for case 3 is really amazing.
Knowing nothing about your particular code... chances are good that somebody is not measuring what he thinks he's measuring. If you want a sample of the kinds of issues you should consider, have a look at http://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/test/efficiency.cpp -- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com