5 Feb
2007
5 Feb
'07
3:02 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 04 February 2007 15:36 pm, Timmo Stange wrote:
Timmo Stange wrote: - Is it really desirable to completely replace the current implemen- tation with a thread-safe one (parameterizable or not) while it seems clear that the tracking mechanism will definitely be different for each version?
Maybe the boost::trackable could be removed from the official interface, but still be provided by the implementation for the sake of backwards compatibility? - -- Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFx0cW5vihyNWuA4URAgB3AJ40O5VVpsmiAcLjVgTLAk+fyltf0wCfQQYG CRRUUYr86Wp48/YzIatYcLY= =50gQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----