Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation

I can be patient :). I just wanted to air my grievances and hope that someone who knows what they're doing would clean things up. I'm glad it's already being worked on. I'd be happy to comment on the alpha version whenever it's published. I couldn't say much about correctness of content, of course, but I can check grammar, links, and clarity. Thanks! James Hamlin On 8/2/07, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

"Gennadiy Rozental" wrote in message news:f8t445$3ho$1@sea.gmane.org...

...

...

"James Hamlin" wrote in message news:dd89626a0707311246h7a117da8kd9c392b3b2cb9f2d@mail.gmail.com... Hi,

I've begun using Boost.Test to construct test suites for a project, and

...

...

looks like it does a great job and is full of nice features (I really

...

...

the auto unit tests). >But I have a big complaint: the documentation is pretty poor.

Just a bit more paitient guys ;))

I should be able to publish an alpha version of new completely reworked BoostBook Based documnetation for the Boost.Test in a couple days. I will really appritiate read through it and let me know if is

it like there

...

any

I meant to say: "If you" here ^

...

problems (from any standpoint: english, content, missing link, incorrect link etc)

Regards

Gennadiy

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users