26 Feb
2007
26 Feb
'07
4:31 a.m.
On Sunday 25 February 2007 07:40 pm, Timmo Stange wrote:
A signal would then rather be a handle object, or not? I wouldn't see a problem in this if it were just for the invocation and connection to another signal, but with member functions like connect() and disconnect() it would appear like a rather unusual construct to me.
It would be like signals::connection, which is a handle object and has a disconnect(). -- Frank