I agree with this as well.
At 04:23 PM 3/2/2009, you wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:28
PM, Thorsten Ottosen
<nesotto@cs.aau.dk>
wrote:
- - What is your evaluation of the design?
The 'ed naming is not good, and for consistency across Boost the
_view
naming should be used.
However, in my mind map each of the adaptors is a verb rather than a
noun, so
the expression should read as
rng | sort | unique
rather than
rng | sort_view | unique_view
Whereas when the function invocation syntax is used the _view naming
seems to
express the intent more clearly. ie
unique_view( sort_view( rng ) )