28 Feb
2003
28 Feb
'03
6:59 p.m.
At 06:55 AM 2/28/2003, Markus Werle wrote:
I see several possibilities:
1. The standard rules, AFAICS, are meant for the _user_ interface (I guess this from the bogus names some vendors use to make their internal code completly unreadable)
So would it be acceptable if some boost::lib is rule-compliant in the interface and for the "public" namespaces, while retaining the other style in the brain-damaging internals, where some programmers might need them to understand their own code?
I'm not sure that exact question has been asked before. My immediate reaction is that naming conventions are much more important for the public interface than for implementation internals. --Beman