On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
Yep, I see. You're right. Well, you can refer to get<> as follows
boost::tuples::get
Note that this is not relying on undocumented implementation, so called "const lists" are explained and made public at
http://boost.org/libs/tuple/doc/tuple_advanced_interface.html
So I'd say you can use the former reference to get safely.
That doesn't work. boost::tuples::get has 3 template arguments, not 2. You need to do this: boost::tuples::get< N , typename Tuple::head_type , typename Tuple::tail_type > As a matter of fact, you can drop the 'tuples::' as well. Even then, a problem remains (and the approach I suggested doesn't solve that either): the overload of the function on the constness of the parameter. So you have to explicitly cast the function or make a wrapper. -- François Duranleau LIGUM, Université de Montréal "Ne me demandez pas comment ça va, car je vous mentirai." - moi-même _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users