"Arkadiy Vertleyb" wrote in message
news:d08fe8$mkc$1@sea.gmane.org...
| "Thorsten Ottosen" wrote
| > "Arkadiy Vertleyb" wrote in message
| > I don't get this. Surely one of the functions would be a better match than
| > the others and hence called.
|
| How is
|
| namespace MyNamespace
| {
| template<class T> end(const T&);
| }
|
| is better match than
|
| namespace YourNamespace
| {
| template<class T> end(const T&);
| }
| ?
|
| And now:
|
| MyNamespace::FooYourNamespace::Bar obj;
| end(obj); // ?????
Why would any function but the primary template be taking
a const T& param, that is, why don't your
YourNamespace::end() refer to some class in YourNamespace?
-Thorsten
