Cromwell Enage wrote:
1. Will BOOST_PARAMETER_IMPL(name) expand to the name of the function that actually "owns" the main body of code?
No, or at least is doesn't at this point.
2. Will there be a way to define a Boost.Parameterized member function outside the class definition? Or should we let the compiler decide whether or not to inline such a function?
It is possible, but it's complicated by the return-type calculation. For example, the expansion-tail of: BOOST_PARAMETER_FUNCTION( (void), f, tag, (required (x, (float)) (optional (y, (float), 0)) ) is something like: template < class ResultType , class Args , class x_type , class y_type
ResultType boost_param_default_21f( ResultType(*)() , Args const& args , x_type& x , y_type& y ) right now. We could improve the name and get rid of the __LINE__ from it, but it's hard (or impossible) to get rid of ResultType argument. -- Daniel Wallin