data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b2ed/7b2ed578b3e996d414df9531b2aab8484a0dcb34" alt=""
3 Mar
2012
3 Mar
'12
9:49 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Noe Casas Manzanares
The C++ committee is calling for library proposals for their inclusion in C++11: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3370.html .
I think some of the boost libraries are good candidates, like the recently accepted boost::lockfree. Has anyone considered sending such proposal?
Lock-free algorithms are neat and typically scale very well, but are easily misunderstood and often used for the wrong reasons (like performance). C++ could certainly use concurrency-safe containers (Intel's TBB has a lot of stuff that could be donated), but I think focusing on lock-free ones is the wrong approach. -- Cory Nelson http://int64.org