On 6/22/05, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
"Thomas Matelich" <matelich@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3944d45805062213536c52a507@mail.gmail.com...
On 6/22/05, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
"Thomas Matelich" <matelich@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3944d45805062113231fa767ff@mail.gmail.com...
Probably a dumb question, but why did you use <sys/vfs.h> and statfs() instead of the POSIX <sys/statvfs.h> and statvfs()? Were they not present on some of the target systems?
I would like to include the functionality in Boost.Filesystem, but am concerned because POSIX lists it as optional.
I started with our legacy HP implementation as a reference and didn't need to change it for linux, so I didn't even notice that there was a different header. :-)
Understood. Does the legacy HP implementation also supply <sys/statvfs.h> and statvfs()?
I slapped myself as soon as I saw the question, should have included that info in my first response. Yes, HP does have that.