On 6/22/05, Beman Dawes
"Thomas Matelich"
wrote in message news:3944d45805062213536c52a507@mail.gmail.com... On 6/22/05, Beman Dawes
wrote: "Thomas Matelich"
wrote in message news:3944d45805062113231fa767ff@mail.gmail.com... Probably a dumb question, but why did you use
and statfs() instead of the POSIX and statvfs()? Were they not present on some of the target systems? I would like to include the functionality in Boost.Filesystem, but am concerned because POSIX lists it as optional.
I started with our legacy HP implementation as a reference and didn't need to change it for linux, so I didn't even notice that there was a different header. :-)
Understood. Does the legacy HP implementation also supply
and statvfs()?
I slapped myself as soon as I saw the question, should have included that info in my first response. Yes, HP does have that.