On Sep 26, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Sep 25, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Simon Buchan wrote:
Hmm, I think a lot of distributions of TR1 will, at first, be edited, copied, trimmed, out-of-date, versions of boost's implementations anyway,
I'm not sure this is true; at least, it isn't for the 3 implementations of TR1 that I know are in development. All of them were built (mostly) from scratch, although the authors did borrow some ideas and test cases from the Boost implementations.
<nod> CodeWarrior Pro 9 has: template <class Sig> class result_of template <class T> class reference_wrapper template <class T> reference_wrapper<T> ref(T& t) template <class T> reference_wrapper<const T> cref(const T& t) template <class Sig> class function template<class T> class shared_ptr template<class T> class weak_ptr template<class T> class enable_shared_from_this template <class T0, class T1, ... class T9> class tuple Pro 10 (beta) adds: bind array type_traits All built as Doug describes. This "native" implementation can take advantage of compiler functionality such as __declspec__ or __typeof__, and superior type traits support. And bind just kicks butt with rvalue reference capability turned on. ;-) Definitely not "copied, trimmed, out-of-date." -Howard