Re: [Boost-users] Problem with variadic BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM in Clang

On 11/14/2013 1:16 AM, Matt Calabrese wrote:

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Edward Diener mailto:eldiener@tropicsoft.com> wrote:

When Paul created the code for automatically determining if a compiler has variadic macro support he did not include clang as among the compilers for which BOOST_PP_VARIADICS is 1 ( variadic support is on ). Please try specifically turning on variadic macro support for clang by defining BOOST_PP_VARIADICS=1 when you use the clang compiler.

Shouldn't this branching be inverted now that variadic macros are standard? In other words, shouldn't it rely on BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_MACROS?

Currently Boost PP does not depend on any other Boost library, not even Config. I imagine that Paul might respond to this issue. If he does not I will notify him of it.