On 10/4/2010 1:51 PM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Maddock Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:21 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Users! Who'd like to wave goodbye to #ifdef BOOST_MSVC6_* workarounds?
Is there a 'do nothing' option here? Ie., leave the codebase unchanged but no longer declare MSVC6 support, and so no longer require authors to support it?
LOL, I suspect that's the current situation ;-)
Agree - so let's just leave the code as is (perhaps adding a stronger "you're entirely on your own with VC6" rider?)
The risks of removing are not worth the effort.
(And whoever suggested it would be fun needs to get out more ;-)
I think that you are minimizing the fact that removing workaround code for an implementation which is no longer supported may make understanding code easier for maintainers.