
6 Jul
2007
6 Jul
'07
3:37 p.m.
Anders Wang Kristensen wrote:
That solution is really impractical, IMHO. If this is really the only solution, I would consider the serialization lib broken wrt to DLLs, and that should be in the docs somewhere.
That's really too bad, since it is such a nice and useful library!
I.e. how would you solve the following, if A and B are unrelated libraries in seperate DLLs sharing a class X that is serialized as part of serializing A and B?
Place code to implement X in its own DLL. Robert Ramey