Re: [Boost-users] ADL comment in noncopyable

14 Jun 2006


      me22 wrote:
...
On 6/14/06, Steven E. Harris  wrote:
...
me22  writes:
...
Presumably if noncopyable were defined in namespace boost, then
function calls involving classes deriving from noncopyable would get
namespace boost added to the ADL scopes in which the function is
looked up.
Even if the derivation is private, as it should be for such an
implementation detail?
Yes, even if the derivation is private.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com