8 Mar
2005
8 Mar
'05
10:07 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
"David Abrahams"
wrote in message news:usm35lvo0.fsf@boost-consulting.com... I guess the ugly adl_ prefix
do you now anything less ugly? It clearly states the purpose of the function.
Both begin() and range_begin() are much less ugly. adl_ as a prefix doesn't save you from colliding with another ADL customization point, if your convention catches on. It only saves you from g++. It's sad that one broken compiler has the power to make our interfaces ugly. Most other offenders only made the implementation ugly. And g++ will likely stay that way. If I had more free time I'd get mad.