Re: [Boost-users] [Signals] Proposal effort for TR2

Doug Gregor wrote:

We'll naturally be taking the good features from both libraries (tracking, combining, syntax, etc.) and tossing out the bad (*ahem* named slot groups). Interested Boosters are welcome to join us over in that forum.

You probably don't want this question here, but would thread-safety by discussed for the proposal? We couldn't use boost::signals because it wasn't thread-safe and ended-up using our own wrapper around boost::signals which made them thread-safe. Cheers Russell