9 Nov
2011
9 Nov
'11
5:50 p.m.
on Wed Nov 09 2011, Szymon Gatner
OK, I took a look. It seems fine to me!
So how about including it to boost? ;)
I support the idea. If you want it to be its own library, you need to go through the review process. However, I suggest you get Peter Dimov's attention to see if he'll include it in the smart_ptr library.
P.S. Should custom implementation leveraging EBO for deleter (unique_ptr_storage class) be replaced with compressed_pair or not depending on additional library is more desirable in that case?
If you want Peter to accept it, I think you should leave the custom implementation in. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com