Re: [Boost-users] [pool] singlton_pool::malloc returning bad address

3 Jul 2009

      AMDG

Jonathan Leonard wrote:
...
It's called with 5 different data structures (all with a different size).  I'm not exactly sure the distribution of these but can measure it if that would be of use.  Here are the [obfuscated but structurally-equivalent] types:
struct T1
{
  C* _p;
  boost::function<void (int, bool)> _f;
  unsigned __int64 _offset1;
  unsigned __int64 _offset2;
  boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<BYTE, VirtualAllocator<BYTE>>> _vec;
};
struct T2
{
  boost::function<void (bool)> _f;
};
struct T3
{
  C* _p;
  C* _p2;
};
struct T4
{
  C* _p;
  C* _p2;
  unsigned int _i;
  unsigned int _i2;
  C* _p3;
  unsigned int _i3;
  C* _p4;
  int _i4;
};
struct T5
{
  C* _p;
  int _i;
  int _i2;
  unsigned int _i3;
  unsigned int _i4;
};
Which of these causes problems?
Or do the pools all get corrupted?

I've just tried running about 35 billion 8-byte allocations without any 
problems.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe