Re: [Boost-users] Re: Configquestion:BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T(Intel7.1)

It seems to me that it would be better still to put

#ifdef BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(is_same<unsigned short, wchar_t>::value); #else BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(!is_same<unsigned short, wchar_t>::value); #endif

after the conditional definition of BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T to verify that the macro has been set/unset correctly.

Not a bad idea, but it brings in a lot of type-traits code that may not actually be needed... John.