Re: [Boost-users] Re: boost::program options question. Implicit() doesn't seem to work

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:41:39 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:

I think it's the library. But in any case, I plan to remove the 'implicit' flag in 1.33. Why do you want it? What about:

Really? I thought that was quite useful for things like. $ foo --help usage: foo [-sexy-options] $ foo --help topic The "topic" option crazumps the doobryferk. Is there a better way than implicit for that? Is implicit causing some ugliness that warrants it's excise?

desc.add_options() ("debug", bool_option(), "enable debugging")

? - Volodya

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-- Blue Skies