20 Jul
2012
20 Jul
'12
8:13 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Steven Watanabe
I guess the real question is this: is there a way to define is_memcpyable so that the value is true if a class does not define operator=, and all of it's members or inherited types are also memcpyable?
No there isn't. This requires compiler support.
I had feared as much. Is this case "fixed" in c++11? Thanks, Brian