
Hi Marshall, On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:51 AM, Boost-users wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 10:32 AM, David Hauck
wrote: On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:44 AM, Boost-users wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of boost:process, when looking on internet you can find different version that are more or less compatible. Not an ideal situation and I am a bit surprised that this lib doesn't get more love from c++ dev.
<snip>
I'm also curious why this library hasn't been integrated into the standard set of Boost libraries. Would someone be kind enough to provide some (current) background on the latest thinking/status of this?
Because it has not yet been accepted into Boost.
Ya, I figured that ;).
It was reviewed a couple years ago, and rejected (for good reasons).
OK, this is part of what I was looking for: where would I find the results of that review?
Boris has spent a lot of time reworking the library, and plans to resubmit it for review.
...and this is the second part of what I was looking for. Does anyone have any idea of timeframe for this? I realize the review process time frame is somewhat indeterminate, but wondered about the nominal time for review of a library of this size/complexity and also any approximation for the time frame for re-submission? Thanks! -David
- Marshall (who was the review manager)
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users