17 Sep
2009
17 Sep
'09
7:26 p.m.
Sorry not necessarily, that was incorrect.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Igor R
typo:
so (100, 5) should be the 1st entry on the 2nd index
so *why* (100, 5) should be the 1st entry on the 2nd index _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users