21 May
2008
21 May
'08
4:41 p.m.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Noah Roberts
Maik Beckmann wrote:
The compiler is right, omit the typename keyword if you're not inside a template. In this case you can even write tup.get<enumFoo>() instead of tup.template get<enumFoo>()
Should I have had that in my function? The compiler didn't bitch about it not being there...
I also test my code before posting to lists and such unless otherwise expressed. The code I originally posted compiled and worked just fine. Can you cite chapter and verse why it shouldn't have? I try to be as standard compliant as I can.
http://www.comeaucomputing.com/techtalk/templates/#templateprefix --Michael Fawcett