Re: [Boost-users] boost 1.46.1 vs. boost 1.49.0 ?

It looks like there is something to do with the compiler? Whenever I tried to use gcc, I will get the errors like íÎ󣺴ÓÀàÐÍ¡®bool (*)(const string&) {aka bool (*)(const std::basic_string<char>&)}¡¯µ½ÀàÐÍ¡®boost::enable_if_c::type* {aka void*}¡¯µÄת»»ÎÞЧ [-fpermissive] C:/boost/boost/filesystem/v3/path.hpp:131:5: ´íÎó£º ³õʼ»¯¡®boost::filesystem3::path::path(const Source&, typename boost::enable_if >::type*) [with Source = std::basic_string<char>, typename boost::enable_if >::type = void]¡¯µÄʵ²Î 2 [-fpermissive] If I'm using Visual Studio 2010, there is no error report. I just finished testing my code using boost 1.49.0 under Windows7. I was testing my code with CodeLite with GCC compiler, and Visual Studio 2010. How come this type of error report? Cheers Pei On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:04 PM, JIA Pei wrote:

Hi, all:

My code is as simple as:

...

path tempp(dir_path, native );

It used to work for boost 1.42. And now, it's working fine with boost 1.49.0 ... However, current Ubuntu 11.10 affords boost 1.46.1. Whenever I tried to compile my code with boost 1.46.1, I got the following errors:

invalid conversion from ‘bool (*)(const string&) {aka bool (*)(const

...

std::basic_string<char>&)}’ to ‘boost::enable_if_c::type* {aka void*}’ [-fpermissive]

In addition, I notice there are some other errors at the same time, which seems to have something to do with filesystem3 ?

Invalid arguments '

...

Candidates are: bool is_directory(boost::filesystem3::file_status) bool is_directory(const boost::filesystem3::path &) bool is_directory(const boost::filesystem3::path &, boost::system::error_code &) '

However, why my code is able to compile with boost 1.49.0 then?

Cheers Pei

--

Pei JIA

Email: jp4work@gmail.com cell: +1 604-362-5816

Welcome to Vision Open http://www.visionopen.com

-- Pei JIA Email: jp4work@gmail.com cell: +1 604-362-5816 Welcome to Vision Open http://www.visionopen.com