Re: [Boost-users] [Test] Running individual test cases

"Sohail Somani" wrote in message news:1C1EBEF8DBACDC439D038EA051674EC735B961@xbox.financialcad.com...

...

-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:31 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Test] Running individual test cases

"Sohail Somani" wrote in message news:1C1EBEF8DBACDC439D038EA051674EC735B941@xbox.financialcad.com...

...

Hi,

I recall a thread about running individual test cases by name. Might even have been yesterday. Anyway, I'd like to put in a "me too" vote for that and also ask what I can currently do to continue using the auto registration capability but perhaps modify it to only register certain functions? Would I need to create my own test suite?

I could always use compile time switches

This *could* work, but imho it really prevents the quick turn around you need when debugging unit tests. I personally would prefer the test runner to by default run all tests and given a bunch of --run_test=test1 --run_test=test2 command line arguments, it runs only those tests.

If you could tell me what to read or change to get the framework to do this, I'd be happy.

It's not simple chnage. It requires modifications on many levels. You will have to wait will 1.35. Sorry. Gennadiy