I don't know yet... i'll check when i have a little time... anyway i guess it is a good and possible explanation... and maybe a good reason to change the names in the boost side (of the moon) ;-) what do you think ? regards, Mathieu -- http://www.incub.net/ Marshall Clow a écrit :
At 7:46 AM +0200 7/13/08, Mathieu Peyréga wrote:
Hello,
I have an issue with i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
it seem to appear with the keyword "check" for example on files :
detail/is_dereferencable.hpp detail/is_incrementable.hpp
bzip2.hpp
I have some compilation like : "error: declaration does not declare anything"
wich disappears if i rename the check in both first files to check_ (everywhere in the file)
and check_error in the third one... (and of course in the bzip2.cpp file too then)
It does not happen on the very same code with gcc-4.3.0 (mingw version) nor vc8.0
does this renaming have possible side effects I have not seen (my code compiles, links, and seems to run with the modification...)
Any explainations for this ?
Are you including
(directly or indirectly)? It defines macros named "check" and "check_error". The file is located at: /usr/include/AssertMacros.h.