It would be really usefoul to have something like that :) Thank you QbProg
I have something in the dataflow library that I am planning to take in the direction you're suggesting. The current syntax allows something like this:
FunctionOne = make_slot_selector<void (int, int)> ( &Implementor::ImplOne , i ); FunctionTwo = make_slot_selector<bool (int)>( &Implementor::ImplTwo , &i);
So it's not (yet) quite what you're looking for, but when the member function is not overloaded I don't think I need the signature to be specified explicitly, and can provide something like
FunctionOne = make_slot_selector( &Implementor::ImplOne , i );
But I haven't had time to try it yet :-) I was going to try to do one last push this weekend to get this lib submitted for review, maybe as a part of that effort I can give this a whirl.
Stjepan _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users