Thanks Guys! I verified your analysis by adding virtual destructor to polymorphic oarchive and mem leak vanished as expected. Currently due to some constraints I cannot move to boost 1.36. In that case, do you think it's sufficient to just add these virtual destructors ? Or there are some other significant fixes related to serialization which also need to be merged from 1.35 code base? -Sameer On 12/3/08, Kim Barrett <kab.conundrums@verizon.net> wrote:
At 10:42 AM +0530 12/3/08, sam p wrote:
But if I modify below given code as given below then it doesn't show any memory leak. I am using boost 1.32.
The virtual destructor for polymorphic_oarchive (and iarchive) was added relatively recently, I think in boost 1.35. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users