2 Jan
2008
2 Jan
'08
10:55 p.m.
Frank Mori Hess wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 14:27 pm, Nat Goodspeed wrote:
I meant to ask: does the thread_safe_signals submission include a summary of API differences from the 1.34 signals library? I remember there was substantial e-mail discussion about that, but I can't remember the outcome.
Hmm, no. It does seem like it should have one though, I'll add a section to the documentation for that.
Thanks! Some of my colleagues are eager to switch to thread_safe_signals. If there are ways we should constrain our current use of the signals library to make that future conversion easier, I'd like to know them.