Re: [Boost-users] [boost.msm] BOOST_MSM_EUML_DECLARE_STATE_MACHINE with state base class

I can do (with msm.euml):

... SomeState + SomeEvent / SomeAction ...

But actually I want 'SomeState' to decide what it does on 'SomeEvent'.

Wouldn't it make sense to call, for example,

SomeState::operator()(SomeEvent const&)

(or a templated form of that) in that case ? Or maybe 'SomeState::on_internal(...)' ?

Any thoughts?

Regards, Stefan --

Hi Stefan, you can achieve the same with a transition table internal to a state, with the added bonus that you can have guards and therefore several possible actions depending on them. HTH, Christophe