Actually I'm uncertain on this point and in fact have changed back and forth on this very point. I believe that various check-ins of extended type info in various branches of the cvs tree reflect this Robert Ramey mos wrote:
That's painful! I have used serialization in servral modules already. I comment the line 71 assert(lookup(eti) == m_self->m_map.end()); and it work. Is there any risk?
"Robert Ramey" <ramey@rrsd.com> wirte:
This would be best addressed by having the serialization in either the one module (the dll) or the other (mainline exe) but not both.
Robert Ramey
jiang.yu(mos) wrote:
Hi!
I meet trouble in use serialization in dll in dll export a function like hi_dll() void hi_dll() { std::map<std::string,int> m_map; std::ostringstream os; boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(os); oa & m_map; std::cout << os.str() << std::endl; } and in exe there is a function hi_exe() code is the same as hi_dll void hi_exe() { std::map<std::string,int> m_map; std::ostringstream os; boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(os); oa & m_map; std::cout << os.str() << std::endl; }
in Debug mode , the exe call both hi_exe() and hi_dll() will assert at extended_type_info.cpp line 71
assert(lookup(eti) == m_self->m_map.end());
vc7.1 boost 1.33.1 link with serialization as dll
then what to do? thanks in advance.
Best Regards mos