"Pierre-Jules Tremblay"
Well.. in general, not that often, I suppose.
In our augmented version of your test framework, I've implemented fairly sophisticated logic to catch memory leaks on a per-test-case basis.
Would you be interrested t oshare it with us if it's generic enough?
In the results accounting, I need to know whether a test failed because of a memory leak or because it failed a predicate check.
Come to think of it, perhaps this belongs more as an FAQ item for the documentation rather than a tool proper.
Ok.
pj
On 8/17/06, Gennadiy Rozental
wrote: "Pierre-Jules Tremblay"
wrote in message news:4590bfef0608171408o5637d299s452bf55c19fbd6dd@mail.gmail.com... I am such an impatient lad, I answered my own question:
#include
if ( boost::unit_test::results_collector.results( boost::unit_test::framework::current_test_case().p_id ).passed() ) { // do something useful. }
Is there a better way?
Looks right. I would define a alias for boost::unit_test.
How about providing a tool wrapper for this feature?
Why do you need this? How frequent do you think this would be requested?
Gennadiy
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users