Filip Konvi?ka ha escrito:
If you're using Boost 1.34, then you can simply use
hashed_unique< tag<userid>, member
> Hi,
I'm just curious - is there a reason why "member" takes 3 template parameters, and not just one, like in
member<&Peer::userid>
? The first two types can be extracted from the member pointer, so I find this a bit redundant...
It certainly looks redundant, but it turns out you really cannot do what
you propose:
template<...>
struct member;
What should "..." look like? It's not a type parameter, but it cannot
be made a non-type parameter either since we don't know the type
of the pointer-to-member being passed...
In decltype- (or typeof-) enabled compilers a terser syntax could be
achieved by using some macro hackery:
template