Cromwell Enage wrote:
--- Alejandro Aragon
wrote: Hello everyone. I'm trying to implement Fleury's algorithm to find an Eulerian path in a graph. Every time I erase an edge in the graph, I need to check how many connected components I have (because I can't erase an edge that is a "bridge"). Also, I was using in the beginning graphs with VertexList=VecS but it turns out that when you erase an edge all the vertex descriptors are invalidated.
Vertex descriptors should only be invalidated upon a remove_vertex call, not a remove_edge call.
Yes, you're right. I didn't include all the code but of course I have to remove a vertex to work with the connected components algorithm. The reason behind this is that if you remove all the edges from a vertex, you end up having 2 or more components. Therefore, once all the edges from a vertex are removed, then you have to remove the vertex so that the connected components can give you only 1 component.
Thus, I had to copy my graph to another one with VertexList=listS.
I was wondering if the connected components algorithm works with this type of graph. I'm having an error.
An adjacency_list with VertexList=listS does not automatically contain a vertex_index property map, as it would with VertexList=vecS.
I know this also, and if you look at the code, then you'll see that before I copy all the information I need from the previous graph, then I assign indexes using a property map.
HTH, Cromwell D. Enage
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
I was thinking in another way to solve this problem. It would be nice if the connected components could work only on a subgraph of an existing one. Let's say that you just color the edges and vertexes that you don't want the algorithm to work on. In this way, I don't need to remove edges from the graph and the VertexList=vecS is still valid for my problem. I would have to define another visitor for this but I really don't know how to do this. Even though I know how to program in C++, I don't know much about generic programming. Alejandro Aragon