6 Apr
2011
6 Apr
'11
11:02 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Eric Niebler
On 4/6/2011 5:12 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
You could very well make the case that, indeed, nothing but subnamespaces should be in boost.
I'm not making that case, exactly. I'm saying that boost::function should actually be defined in boost::function_adl_block and be imported into the boost namespace with a using declaration.
Forgiver my ignorance here, but if you do that which namespaces are then considered for ADL? boost, boost::function_adl_block or both? Thx - Rob.