On 1 March 2012 16:55, Frank Birbacher
Right, and in such places the size of the size member is usually irrelevant. Anyway it would not hurt to statically select the size member type by the max size template parameter in order to cover a use case like mine.
Note: I'm not against it in the implementation (I've done this kind of thing myself); only in the interface. My only concern is the performance cost for typical uses. The feature I suggested to Marshall that I would like to see is a way to default initialize elements (normally unspecified elements should be value initialized so as to match the other containers) for construction, resize, push_back, emplace_back, insert, etc. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com (847) 691-1404