"Robert Ramey" <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote in message news:e1ndd8$ebp$1@sea.gmane.org...
I attempted to use the minimal verision of boost test. In order to do this I replaced occurencs of
#include <boost/test/exec_monitor.hpp> with #include <boost/test/minimal.hpp>
Is there any particular reasons why you want to do this? My general recommendation: unless there is a reason stick with UTF.
This generates a few problems.
a) In the tests which use the serialization DLL, It seems that references are being made to symbols in the library. Here is the output from the link. I can't figure out why this is.
I don't think you could do this. My guess is that you define BOOST_DYN_LINK that will cause dynamic version of execution monitor sumbols to be compiled. And minimal test facility isn't cut for that.
b) At least a few "test tools" macros aren't present BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL and BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE among themRobert Ramey
Actually 99% of them is absent. And only 3 are present. But that was your choice, isn't it? Gennadiy