Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of a universal data type

Thanks for the clarification... Gokul. On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:

"Gokulakannan Somasundaram" wrote in message I could always create a new data-type(say SerializableDatum) with all the required info, but then this data-type is being created only for the purpose of serialization. Is there any better way to achieve the same result?

What could be better than this? For an example look at the NVP wrapper and the documentation of serialization wrappers. This method of "adding extra data" (for xml this means the name tag of the variable) has worked very well.

Robert Ramey

Thanks, Gokul.

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users