[Boost-users] Re: Boost Logging Library?

Jwahar Bammi wrote:

I dont understand the need for the "Proposed Boost logging library". A perfectly good and flexible logging library exists in the form of log4cxx, which is much more flexible than the proposal, has a ton of tools, appenders, is compatible with log4j/log4net etc etc

Then, why don't you take part in formal review, when it happens, and list all the inflexibilities and missing tools/appenders in the proposed library? That's the simplest way to affect things. Or, better yet, you can give that list right now so that it can be discussed before the review. - Volodya