Re: [Boost-users] Suggestion for boost`s smart pointers

David Klein wrote:

so are there any objections about adding this feature to scoped_ptr?

I'm sure I have seen this discussion before. I believe the issue was the size of scoped_ptr itself. It is supposed to be a lightweight object, no bigger than the pointer it holds. Any added overhead is unacceptable. If you can implement the feature without adding any data members, fine. Otherwise, please create a new class. -- Dick Hadsell 914-259-6320 Fax: 914-259-6499 Reply-to: hadsell@blueskystudios.com Blue Sky Studios http://www.blueskystudios.com 44 South Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601