Jaakko Järvi wrote:
On Jul 5, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Vishnevetsky, Eugene ((IT)) wrote:
I came across this problem in the real project where I don't control the class that corresponds to class Y of the example, so I can't change the signature of the member function. I could write a wrapper function that takes Y*, but after some point the code with a simple 'for' loop becomes cleaner and more readable than the one using lambda. If this problem is not a bug, but an inherent limitation of the lambda library or its current implementation, it would be nice if it is mentioned in the documentation.
It's a bug, but requires quite a bit of changes to fix. LL/Phx fusion will (it will happen eventually :) resolve it.
Definitely! Daniel Wallin has done the last remaining part of the algorithms. Dan Marsden is working on porting LL exceptions. I think we'll see it happen sooner rather than later. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net