Re: [Boost-users] [serialization, 1_33_0] Correct usage and implementation for serializable objects without default constructors

signatureAll the above discussion is really a discussion about what the assignment of an object that has a const member means. Well, in C++, it really doesn't make sense and I agree. That's why I believe there's some tiny piece missing from the serialization library. We should also be able to unserialize instances through a factory that returns an actual object rather than having to use operator>>. Here's some code showing this idea that works along with the previous example. ... I don't think this adds anytihing of value. Robert Ramey